Top 5 Myths About Google You Need To Know!

Google is the world's largest and world-famous Internet corporation that is expected to achieve a $65 billion revenue in 2015. He gets attention every week, such as the government's 2012 survey of anti-trust practices published unexpectedly last week. But although Google is so well known, it is usually misunderstood. Five popular myths are present here.
Image Source : Pixabay

1. Google Is An Organization Of Search Engine

Search is the prime product of Google. The company has so widespread use of its web search that "Google" is a dictionary-approved verb, which sells all the money it has for searching ads.

However, Google's efforts to drive its own vehicle and ballon, which provide stratospheric internet access, show that it isn't just a search company. Her long-term goal is to grow into a corporation with artificial intelligence.

In addition, the work department Google has developed around the AIs and machine learners and has also engaged renowned AI expert, Ray Kürzweil, who thinks that by 2045 humans would merge into machines in what's considered as 'the singularity.' Google's latest acquisitions speak for her intentions. Noone ever knows when Google is going to do with all these machines and AI apps, but their goals are way beyond driving vehicles.

It is being carried out inside Google X, the super secret research laboratory of the organization. There are a few hundred people there working, a small but powerful 53,600 Google workers. Google is not alone in seeking to develop IA (Facebook already has an AI development team), but it is one of the very few companies that can render true Artificial Intelligence possible with brainpower and financial capital. Plus, AI is bloodshed: Google's co-founder and CEO, Larry Page, is son of famed AI pioneer Carl Page, and is directly financing a reverse engineering development project for a worm's brain. "It'll always be an artificial intelligence firm that I speak about Google's long - term with the Larry Page" said tech-capitalist Steve Jurvetson.

2. It Was A Failure Of Google Glass

When Google Glass revealed the organization would stop marketing the $1,500 ridiculous eyewear, reports reported that it was "flopped" and "fired.' Glass was considered clunky as a consumer commodity, too pricey and pointless.

However, Glass should not only be measured by its success in business. I was decided to invite to see some products in the future in the Summer of 2013, among a community of "marketers." Many of the influencers proudly wore Google Glass lid and looked like stupids. None of the Google managers was carrying Glass.

Though since Glass was viewed by Google as a research study, a way to discover wearable computer technology and learn lessons for other, probably less disgusting products. Wearable devices will soon have a massive audience, with devices from virtual realistic goggles to smartwatch wellness options such as the latest Apple watch, and the affordable version Google unveiled this week, all in anger at this South-by-Southwest Tech conference. Although Glass did not catch on it, it generated significant mood and made Google an industry pioneer.

3. Google Is The leader In Silicon Valley Diversity

In May 2014 Facebook and Yahoo were prompted by the corporation to publish its demographics on its workforce. Google has recently conducted seminars to train staff on 'unconscious biais,' and since 2010 Google has contributed millions to organizations aiming at getting girls and women involved in technology. In February, Google reported $775,000 in subsidies to CODE2040 to help more Afro-Americans and Latinos join the sector.

Yet "With Google's recognition among the first miles of where we should just go," heads of "People 's Operations," Laszlo Bock, said only two percent of the black working population, noting that "to provide full clarification as to the scope of the issue is a genuinely essential aspect of the response." Only three women and then no African Americans have Google's 11 member Board of Directors. The top management comprises five officers, all of whom are men, and one black. Ites lead team is 15; only three women, not one African American. Senior management team has 15 members.

Google could also start encouraging one of its strongest agents to stop sexist acting at a global stage. President Schmidt has regularly called out for the overthrow of Megan Smith, a former chief executive of google who now is head of infrastructure for the u.s, by the "unconscious partiality" officer of the organization this week, while Schmidt and Smith have exchanged together in a forum on South by Southwestern.

4. Google's Search Monopolies Are Unassailable

Google is so extensively in the search market that even those who admired this product thought it was not fortunate when Microsoft presented its Bing search engine in 2009. It isn't a fair competition in 2009, "said the Guardian Alex Hoye, head of a search engine marketing company. He's been right. Six years later, Bing's share of the market in search is 12 percent, while Google has 75 percent – higher than its 2009 share. Many competitors continue to seek to chip Yahoo recently gained a little share of the market which now has 10.6 percent but it seems like the game is now over, and Google has dominated in the conventional market for search engines.

However, Microsoft or Yahoa may not pose a serious challenge to the Google search market. It tends to come from Amazon or from Facebook as well as from online shoppers' changing habits. Amazon and Facebook are not strictly in the search business, but more and more people are turning to these websites to find out about products. In other words, Google is not faced with the threat of rivals taking over the conventional search engine market, yet conventional search engines becoming less essential as search on other platforms is carried out. Schmidt recognized last October, "Our largest search opponent is Amazon." "They are clearly based on the trading side of the equation and address consumers' concerns and study at their source just like we are." (Google's apparent solution to the Amazon challenge was to secretly clone Amazons' material to boost its own pages, referring to the government's inquiry in 2012.)

5. The Big Brother Google

Google knows regarding everyones location, everyones browser history, everyones videos, everyones age, everyones gender and your ambitions when you use Google's online service providers such as Search, G-mail, Maps, youTube, Drive and Google+, Android, Wallet and Picasa. The corporation has earned a lot of comparisons with Big Brother. Google rivals like to play the spying skills of the corporation. Microsoft spent billions on its "Scroogled" ad campaign to frighten people from a large, disgraceful corporation which snubbed its users.

Internet is a Big Brother, and yet Google's not: it's also the NSA. The intelligence agency peers at any big technology corporation, hovers sensitive records and fails to think about what it compromised or why. Google gathers information on the users who use its apps, just as many internet businesses — Apple have up to 800 million credit card numbers on its list and even billions of iPhones on its iCloud software. It's not that Google gathers users details but why. The organization has laid out its mission to include more appropriate advertising (and eventually charge more for such advertisements), and there is little evidence to refute it.

Google forcefully replied to the information on the activities of the NSA, which was disclosed in the Edward Snowden leaks, promising to continue developing methods to discourage the agency spying on citizens who are using its services. Co-founder Sergey Brin, a shocker at NSA 's behavior, said that Google has 1,000 protection engineers and has begins to crypt data on its databases. Schmidt defined his defenses as 'techniques that can break through NSA in our lives, no-one thinks.' Mike Hearn, a Google security analyst, gave the answer: "none of us. This industrial-scale subversion of the judiciary process will be answered by the NSA always before a Judge. Therefore, we are doing what internet developers have always done-create better systems in the absence of work-in-compliance.

Post a Comment

0 Comments